New Publisher “South Pacific Journals” Launches with Two Subaltern Journals
Trouble in paradise. I recently learned of an abysmally low-quality open-access publisher with the name “South Pacific Journals.” . There’s no website for the publisher itself, just websites for each...
View ArticleIs JoVE Just Another Spammer?
Scientific spammer. JoVE, the Journal of Visualized Experiments, is an innovative video journal. However, the journal is mercenary and demonstrating at least a couple characteristics of predatory...
View ArticleOMICS International Totally Sucks
Victimizing researchers since 2008. Greetings for the day! I am writing this blog post as yet another reminder that the open-access publisher OMICS International completely sucks. The stark language...
View ArticleMore Rubbish from Hyderabad: Peertechz
A complete fake. Peertechz is another Hyderabad, India-based open-access publisher that is completely counterfeit. It’s a massive spammer, and although it has journals in various fields, it chiefly...
View ArticleBogus Organization Publishes Over 300 Open-Access Journals
Another bogus organization that wants your money. The International Organization of Scientific Research and Development (IOSRD) launched recently with 3.94 x 102 journals. It’s a bogus organization...
View ArticleMore Fringe Science from Borderline Publisher Frontiers
He’s back ! The scandal-plagued, Switzerland-based publisher Frontiers has just published a chemtrails conspiracy theory paper by the same author whose earlier article was published and then retracted...
View ArticleJust-Published Article Evaluates Some Spammy OA Publishers
Worth a read … An article just published in the University of Toronto Press’s Journal of Scholarly Publishing details a test of several scholarly publishers that sent spam emails to the author. She...
View ArticleDo Most Open-Access Journals Require Copyright Transfer?
All rights reserved. Scholarly open-access publishing was designed to be both gratis (free to access online) and libre (free to re-use with proper attribution). However, in my experience, many — if not...
View ArticleNew Open-Access Publisher Has Great Graphics, Lousy Journals
Great graphics, but rubbish journals. There’s a new open-access publisher with a great name — Science Research Library — and with great graphics on its main page. However, the rest of the publisher’s...
View ArticleTwo New Completely Fake Impact Factor Companies
The sparc has gone out. Two new fake impact factor companies have appeared: SPARC Indexing and Root Indexing. They are both counterfeit metrics companies, in my opinion, and any journal that displays...
View ArticleOA Journal Disappears Then Reappears as an OMICS Journal
Bad management. I learned recently that the domain name for one of the publishers on my list had expired. In investigating this, I learned that the publisher’s lone journal has been sold, apparently,...
View ArticleAbout Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review
Complete rubbish. You have probably received a clever, personalized, and manipulative spam email from a journal called Internal Medicine Review. The email includes a purported email exchange between...
View ArticleDoes Everyone in India Want to be a Scholarly Publisher?
Bad management. The number of scholarly open-access publishers and standalone journals based in India is skyrocketing. Everyone there — it seems — wants to get in on the open-access gold rush. Here I...
View ArticleNew “Swedish” OA Publisher Launches with 23 Journals
Fake meatballs Here’s a new scholarly open-access publisher that exploits the name of Sweden: Swedish Scientific Publications. Predatory publishers often commandeer the names of countries to make their...
View ArticleOpen Access is Giving Taxonomy a Bad Name
Do-it-yourself taxonomy. A Peru-based open-access journal devoted to plant taxonomy is bulldozing its way into the field. The “Scientific Editor” and co-author of most of its published articles are one...
View ArticlePredatory Publisher Exploits Einstein, Debases Science
Relatively awful A new, India-based predatory publisher has emerged — Einstein International Journal Organization. The publisher gratuitously uses the name of one of one of history’s greatest...
View ArticleOngoing Questions about PLOS ONE’s Peer Review
Good, cheap, fast: choose one. Scientific spammer PLOS ONE is an ongoing source of amusement. Its peer review is regularly called into question, with the journal accepting unscientific papers. PLOS ONE...
View ArticleAugust’s Harvest: Three Wretched Open-Access Publishers
The rubbish publishers keep on appearing. This blog post profiles three new scholarly open-access publishers added to my list in August, 2016. The names cover the alphabet from A to Z: American...
View ArticleArticle on Fallacious and Pseudoscientific Thought Worth a Read
Definitely worth a read. I subscribe to several saved-search, citation, and table-of-contents alerts, and through these, I learn of 10-20 newly-published scholarly articles each week that match my...
View ArticleUSF Associate Dean is Tied to Dozens of Predatory Journals
Can’t say no. An associate dean from the University of South Florida (USF) is the editor-in-chief of six questionable, open-access journals and serves on the editorial boards of dozens more. He lists...
View Article